» » Poor Things: Episodes from the Early Life of Archibald McCandless M.D. Scottish Public Health Officer
hotellemcasadeicervia.it
ePub 1907 kb. | Fb2 1577 kb. | DJVU: 1332 kb.
Fiction, Literature

Poor Things: Episodes from the Early Life of Archibald McCandless M.D. Scottish Public Health Officer epub ebook

by Alasdair Gray

Poor Things: Episodes from the Early Life of Archibald McCandless M.D. Scottish Public Health Officer epub ebook

Author: Alasdair Gray
Category: Genre Fiction
Language: English
Publisher: Harcourt; 1st U.S. ed edition (March 1, 1993)
Pages: 317 pages
ISBN: 0151730768
ISBN13: 978-0151730766
Rating: 4.8
Votes: 329
Other formats: doc lrf lit mobi


urn:acs6:ay:pdf:4f0-bfa0fccb389e urn:acs6:ay:epub:831-1f3678cf7024 urn:oclc:record:1036790388. Columbia University Libraries.

Poor Things is a novel by Scottish writer Alasdair Gray, published in 1992. It won the Whitbread Novel Award in 1992 and the Guardian Fiction Prize for 1992. However, its Victorian narrative takes in Gray's previous concerns with social inequalities, relationships, memory and identity.

Scottish Public Health Officer Poor Things: Episodes from the Early Life of Archibald McCandless . Scottish Public Health Officer A Harvest Book.

Poor Things: Episodes from the Early Life of Archibald McCandless . Scottish Public Health Officer. Poor Things: Episodes from the Early Life of Archibald McCandless .

Poor Things is a political book. It is also witty and delightfully written. Episodes from the Early Life of a Scottish Public Health Officer. by Archibald McCandless . Attention to Victorian Glasgow with its civic fountains, domestic interiors and medical schools gives the book texture. It is the characters, and strangely enough its phantasmagoria, that give it life’. A master of pastiche and collage in words and pictures, Gray has found a way to perfectly evoke a cracked, slightly out-of-balance sense of reality’. A letter about the book to a grand- or great-grandchild. by Victoria McCandless .

Episodes from the Early Life of a Scottish Public Health Officer. Chapter notes, historical and critical.

15,000 first printing.

Home Gray, Alasdair Poor Things: Episodes from the . The book, which won the 1992 Guardian Fiction Prize, takes off from there.

Home Gray, Alasdair Poor Things: Episodes from the Early Life of Archibald. Poor Things: Episodes from the Early Life of Archibald McCandless M. D. Someone named Alasdair Gray has found a memoir supposedly of a 19th-century public health officer in Glasgow. The truth of the memoir is suspect, nevertheless Gray manages to change it and then lose it. And that's just the backdrop. Poor Things is Gray’s most extended exploration of Scotland’s Imperial history. Scottish Public Health Officer (1992), is a Scottish Frankenstein story in which a pregnant woman is fished from the Clyde after attempting suicide only to have her unborn child’s brain implanted into her own skull. In the central narrative Archibald ‘Candle’ McCandless tells the fantastic story of Bella Baxter’s rebirth at the hands of his outcast friend, the scientist Godwin ‘God’ Baxter, a character from the pages of Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein or Stevenson’s Dr Jekyll And Mr Hyde.

Merchant Ivory Gone Wrong - Poor Things by Alasdair Gray. com User, April 29, 1999. Poor Things' is the perfect example of how Gray understands the power of the medium he works in. Just as two poets could destroy the Eastern Empire in 'Unlikely Stories, Mostly', Gray playfully toys with the reader's perception of reality and truth and how it is influenced by the media. That ambiguity is complicated by her husband Archibald McCandless's autobiography, "Episodes from the Early Life of a Scottish Public Health Officer," which distorts the truth about his life with Bella.

The lives of two doctors become hopelessly entangled with a woman who was created by one of them, in a freewheeling novel set in nineteenth-century Glasgow and the Mediterranean. 15,000 first printing.
Reviews (7)
Rasmus
Excellent. I run across a 5 star book maybe once a year. This is that book. A perfect book to go into blind so the book can just take you where it wants you to go. Spoiler alert: your first reaction after finishing the book will be to turn it over and start all over again.

Orevise
I enjoyed Poor Things very much. Alasdair Gray has a great skill for writing from/for the female perspective. His recurrent theme of women's independence can be seen in both Lanark and 1982, Janine; both of which are better books than this one. But I shouldn't hold Gray's prolificness against this book, so it still gets 4 stars. Fans of Gray will enjoy this novel, but I wouldn't recommend this to first-time Gray readers. Sure, it's not as weird* as the other two books I named, and in that regard might be a bit more accessible to some, but more importantly it lacks the power of those two books (Lanark and 1982, Janine).

What we have here is another excellent book by one of the greatest living authors. It's good to see this book winning some awards and getting Gray (some of) the recognition he deserves.

*this book is still pretty weird.

porosh
I liked it, but not as much as his short stories.

nailer
Great read. I'll be getting more of Gray's books

Benn
good condition & well worth the price since it is a hard cover book & in such good condition . got purchase in just enough time to read for my class.

Kardana
Certainly worth the time -- quirky, funny, poignant, thought-provoking.

Too many references to "socialism" as a good thing -- distracted from the other elements of the book. But can be ignored in the context of an otherwise outstanding read.

Kamick
'Poor Things' is the perfect example of how Gray understands the power of the medium he works in. Just as two poets could destroy the Eastern Empire in 'Unlikely Stories, Mostly', Gray playfully toys with the reader's perception of reality and truth and how it is influenced by the media. Rather than being the author of Poor Things, Gray purports to be merely an editor, who has discovered a manuscript and letter, which he presents for the reader's examination. His personae in this instance implies that the novel has been 'received' rather than 'created'. This lends the rather bizarre proceedings a strange air of credibility, and stops the reader pondering over the likelihood of some of the more extraordinary events occurring. For example, Baxter's "skeely, skeely fingers" performing the "skilfully manipulated resurrection" of a young woman is the stuff of fairy tales, but due to Gray's web of fibs, it is understood as a rational medical discovery rather than a magical act. The main body of the book is presented as a first-person narrative, written by one Archibald McCandless. In it, he describes how an eccentric friend creates a woman from a dead body, in the manner of Baron Frankenstein. However, a letter accompanying the narrative (according to Gray) states that it is little more than a pack of lies. The letter has been written by the very woman who the narrative covered. On top of this confusion, Gray has annotated and analysed the text, and professes to believe the original narrative as true. In this fashion, the novel is as 'stitched together' as Bella herself, every 'fact' seems to be contradicted later, true history is marred by pure fiction, almost making it impossible to separate truth from falsehood. From the very beginning of the novel, the reader is confronted by colliding facts, and must make a choice as to who he or she believes: Archibald or Victoria. Because the choice has to be made between the two characters, Gray's own 'facts' are never brought into doubt. Even the erratum slip in the endpapers adds unnecessary confusion to the proceedings, stating: "The etching on page 187 does not portray Professor Jean Martin Charcot, but Count Robert de Montesquiou-Fezensac." Apart from the fact that the accuracy of this one etching has little if no effect on the reader's perception of the novel, Gray has once again abused the power that has been vested in him by creating unnecessary confusion. If Gray himself was responsible for the illustrations, would he choose to draw the wrong character deliberately, or would he draw the correct one but deliberately try to mislead the readers with an erratum slip? Alternatively, is the etching of someone completely different (i.e. neither Charcot or Count Robert)? Whatever the identity of the etched man, to mislead the reader in this way would be entirely pointless. Therefore, the only rational answer is that the illustrations were done by William Strang and Gray is indeed only the editor. In this fashion, Gray leads the reader to ridiculous conclusions throughout the novel. Another example of this trickery can be found in the medical terminology used within the novel. When describing Bella being shot in the foot by Blessington, McCandless states that the bullet had punctured "the integument between the ulna and radius of the second and third metacarpals". However, Bella, in her letter, describes this terminology as "blethers, havers, claptrap, gibberish, gobbledegook" and then describes the actual wound as "puncturing the tendon of the oblique head of adductor hallucis between the great and index proximal phalanges without chipping a bone". Unless the reader is aware of medical terms for various parts of the foot, neither sentence makes more sense than the other. Gray is fully aware of the power of the written word, as if he had not brought the statement into question, the great majority of his readers would have accepted it as a sound medical analysis. However, as he takes on the persona of the editor, he has put himself into a position to make the reader aware of this power. In a similar way to the etching, the accuracy of the medical description has no bearing on the novel, but is Gray's way of making the point that what is written cannot be assumed to be fact. Although this may seem rather obvious, if I personally looked back over the multitude of books that I have read, there must have been countless occasions of me blindly accepting a similar statement without a second thought. In this way, Gray has used his persona as editor to provoke thought and contemplation in the reader over the book that they have just read. What better way could Gray have found for his piece of writing to have a lasting effect on its reader? Once again, Gray has hidden the key to the entire novel in the epilogue, on this occasion on pages 274-5 of Victoria's letter. The sentence reads: "If you ignore what contradicts common sense and this letter you will find that this book records some actual events during a dismal era... it is as sham-gothic as the Scott Monument". Gray fully realises that his novel is fantastical and the period in which it is set is outwith his own experience. However, Poor Things is the kind of novel which, when read for a second time, offers the reader a whole new perspective on the goings-on and Gray is actively encouraging his readership to do this. By printing the book in a certain order, each section offers a new perspective on the previous ones, encouraging re-reading.

I make it my job to read some pretty weird books--as an aficionado of science fiction and fantasy, I sometimes run into some doozies-- but this novel by Gray has to be one of the strangest that I've run into recently. The fact that this novel was not published in the genre, and won a couple of mainstream awards makes me wonder what else I'm missing in the "mundane" fiction shelves.
Poor Things is supposedly non-fiction, as illustrated by its full title on the title page: "Poor Things: Episodes from the Early Life of Archibald McCandless M.D., Scottish Public Health Officer, Edited by Alasdair Gray." But this is all part of its mystique. Gray has constructed a literary puzzle, a Frankenstein's monster of a book that takes its inspiration from that novel by Mary Shelley as well as the works of Robert Louis Stevenson and H.G. Wells. McCandless is the titular biographer, but the story is actually that of the eccentric Scottish doctor Godwin Baxter and his "creation," Bella Baxter, later known as Dr. Victoria McCandless. Set in Glasgow in the 1880s, the plot entails how McCandless met Baxter, how he then met Baxter's protege Bella and fell in love with her, her subsequent departure, and the circumstances of her return. To reveal any more would be to dilute the heavy stuff of the novel's innovative twists.
If Gray were writing with the Fantasy label stuck on the spine of his books, I would have termed this one a "steampunk" novel for its revisionist look at medicine and technology in a pre-auto world. Fans of Tim Powers and James Blaylock should definitely check this one out.

2016-2020 © www.hotellemcasadeicervia.it
All rights reserved